Watch: The Favourite 2018 123movies, Full Movie Online – Early 18th century. England is at war with the French. Nevertheless, duck racing and pineapple eating are thriving. A frail Queen Anne (Olivia Colman) occupies the throne and her close friend Lady Sarah (Rachel Weisz) governs the country in her stead while tending to Anne’s ill health and mercurial temper. When a new servant Abigail (Emma Stone) arrives, her charm endears her to Sarah. Sarah takes Abigail under her wing and Abigail sees a chance at a return to her aristocratic roots. As the politics of war become quite time consuming for Sarah, Abigail steps into the breach to fill in as the Queen’s companion. Their burgeoning friendship gives her a chance to fulfill her ambitions and she will not let woman, man, politics or rabbit stand in her way..
Plot: England, early 18th century. The close relationship between Queen Anne and Sarah Churchill is threatened by the arrival of Sarah’s cousin, Abigail Hill, resulting in a bitter rivalry between the two cousins to be the Queen’s favourite.
Smart Tags: #female_rivalry #maid #aristocracy #dragged_by_a_horse #british_aristocracy #18th_century #wig #lesbian_sex #target_practice #falling_into_mud #marriage #pet_rabbit #hand_job #violence #vomiting #mud #sedan_chair #duck_race #gout #limping_woman #war_of_the_spanish_succession
123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day
7.5/10 Votes: 201,172 | |
93% | RottenTomatoes | |
91/100 | MetaCritic | |
N/A Votes: 4560 Popularity: 17.477 | TMDB |
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog šThe Favourite is one of the most acclaimed movies of last year, receiving multiple nominations at dozens of awards shows and winning a whole bunch of them (2nd most awarded film of 2018, behind Roma). Being a fan of Yorgos Lanthimosā style, I couldnāt be happier for him, and I was now even more excited to watch what he produced and directed. This movie is a classic example of an Oscarsā tradition of sorts. A lot of audience members make their mission to watch every Best Picture nominee before the big night, and thereās always one film that people fail to grasp on why did it get so much praise? Why are critics all around the world absolutely loving what audiences perceive as an āokayā time at the theater, but which contains a long, weird and maybe even dull (for some) story?
Well, first of all, this is technically a masterpiece. I mean, every single technical aspect is worthy of recognition. The production and set design are gorgeously eyegasmic. The score is unusual for a period piece like this, but it weirdly works, as it continuously elevates the tension between the three main characters and helps the story flow with an always conspicuous, treacherous feeling. Even the cinematography and the plays with candlelight offer some pretty neat scenes. However, and prepare to be surprised, the costume design steals the show from all the other achievements. This is coming from a guy who has utterly no interest in this particular matter and who rarely talks about it, so Iām as surprised as you are.
Itās not due to the costumes being pretty or appropriate to the time period. Almost every movie that tackles these times nail the costume design, but only a few can tell a character arc through it. Even less are capable of embodying the whole screenplay like this Oscar-bait does. Our protagonists have distinct journeys, but their ends all have similarities. One way of understanding the story is through what they wear, which seamlessly represent the arc that each character takes to get where they eventually end up. These layers of storytelling keep the film intriguing, but Lanthimosā uncommon methods plus McNamara and Davisā script will displease some audience members.
The Favourite is that movie that audiences are going to be perplexed about why do critics adore it. Thereās no secret, really. Audience members donāt care about the technical part of films. They couldnāt care less about costume design, cinematography, score or how the screenplay is written. They want to be entertained and have a good time at the theater, so I find reasonable if people leave a bit disappointed with one of the most critically acclaimed movies of 2018. Lanthimos doesnāt deliver formulaic stories, and he certainly doesnāt film them in a regular fashion, so I firmly believe the general public isnāt really going to enjoy this one. His unique style brings a very different tone, pace and filming techniques that people arenāt used to experiencing. Fortunately, thereās more than just technical attributes to this film. Three magnificent and powerful performances from Olivia Colman, Emma Stone, and Rachel Weisz, carry the whole thing to safe harbor.
These three actresses deserve every single nomination they got so far. Colman delivers both a hilarious and emotionally heavy display, as Anne. An incredibly fragile Queen with a shockingly traumatic past, whose love and affection is being fought for between Abigail and Sarah. Most of the laughs this movie gives are through Anne and her petty behavior towards her servants. Colman delivers her body and soul to her role, adding yet another fantastic performance to her splendid career. Weisz is just flawless. Sarahās arc is Abigailās opposite in almost every way, and Rachel is remarkably sharp. She doesnāt really have a definite shining moment like Stone or Colman have, but itās a consistent and robust display from an actress who needed a return to the spotlight.
Nevertheless, itās Emma Stone who shines through with an unbelievable range of emotions and expressions. Her performance in La La Land is great, but as Abigail she is outstanding! She handles her characterās personality change with an impeccable transition regarding her acting and the only reason why sheās probably not getting the Oscar win, is due to the campaign supporting Regina King (If Beale Street Could Talk). Abigail is the character that moves the plot forward by trying to steal Sarahās place near the Queen. Her intelligent and manipulative moves are extremely captivating, as well as her will to gain Anneās love.
Yorgos Lanthimos knows his craft and his weird yet unparalleled style is something that will surely deliver even more divisive and confusing films in the future. From the camera angles to his methods of storytelling, heās one hell of a director-writer-producer! Technically, The Favourite is undoubtedly one of the best movies of the last year. The impressive production and set design plus the addictive score definitely raise the film, but the costume design tells a whole story through what the characters dress during the whole runtime. The screenplay is remarkably-written, filled with complex dialogues and several twists and turns, which lead our characters through eventful arcs.
Olivia Colman and Rachel Weisz deliver compelling performances, but Emma Stone is in another level. Her range is mind-boggling, and she carries a big responsibility by portraying the character who changes the whole story. Nevertheless, the movie feels a bit too long, and the story drops its interest levels during the transition from the second to the third act. Basically, Iāll put it like this: if youāre just a regular audience member who only goes to the theater to eat popcorn while being entertained, The Favourite isnāt going to make you eat your whole bucket; if you watch films through a more in-depth look, then youāll be as marveled as I was by the end of it.
Rating: A-
Hugely entertaining film from start to finish, with amazing performances from the three lead women. Emma Stone proves that once again she’s not just a pretty face as the conniving and troubled Abigail, Rachel Weisz is always on form as the controlling and vindictive Sarah and Olivia Coleman deserved the Oscar as the childish and sickly Queen Anne. Nicholas Hoult’s foppish rogue Harley steals every scene he is in.Yorgos Lanthimos once again has made a beautifully shot film using mostly natural light. I can’t overstate that this film looks gorgeous. Many times over I thought of Barry Lyndon, but with tonnes of humour, foul language, and no Ryan O’Neal to destroy the soul of the film.
I originally gave this 9/10 because I didn’t like the use of fish-eye lens, but I couldn’t stop thinking of how much I enjoyed it so I bumped it up to 10.
Best film I have seen in a very long time.
A charmingly quirky film
Rachel Weisz and Emma Stone are both brilliantly witty and Colman’s performance is nothing less but sublime. The three leads are able to hold a fascinating performance that is difficult to achieve. Yorgos Lanthimos retains a pessimistic view of human nature but all goes down with a touch of British glam, as he pushes the idea of the capricious queen through the far reaches of comedy and almost into tragedy. With its brilliant and dramatic script, the sharp dialogues, the great performances, the wonderful production design contributions and a beautiful cinematography, may be for more open-minded audiences, but it’s such a charmingly quirky film and is my front-runner for the Best Picture Oscar. nikisreviews.gr
What a slow and odd movie
I had looked forward to seeing this for well over a year. Now that I’ve seen it, I can clearly see that my original intention was misguided. This was a total waste of time…
Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 59 min (119 min)
Budget 15000000
Revenue 95918706
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Biography, Comedy, Drama
Director Yorgos Lanthimos
Writer Deborah Davis, Tony McNamara
Actors Olivia Colman, Emma Stone, Rachel Weisz
Country Ireland, United Kingdom, United States
Awards Won 1 Oscar. 185 wins & 346 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A
Sound Mix Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Arricam LT, Panavision PVintage and Nikon Nikkor Lenses, Arricam ST, Panavision PVintage and Nikon Nikkor Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision PVintage and Nikon Nikkor Lenses
Laboratory Cinelab, London, UK (print processing and developing), Goldcrest Post, London, UK (digital intermediate), Kodak Film Lab, London, UK (dailies film processing and transfers)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 50D 5203, Vision3 200T 5213, Vision3 500T 5219)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Super 35 (3-perf) (source format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema