Cold Prey III 2010 123movies

Watch: Fritt vilt III 2010 123movies, Full Movie Online – In 1976, in Jotunheimen, an abused boy stabs to death his mother Sigrid and his stepfather Gunnar in an abandoned hotel and the family is considered missing by the local Sheriff Einar and authorities. Twelve years later, the teenagers Hedda and her boyfriend Anders, Siri, Knut, Magne and Simen take a lift with Sheriff Einar telling that they will hike in the woods. However they go to the abandoned hotel expecting to spend the night in the place but they find dust and rats and prefer to stay camping in the woods. In the morning, Siri and Knut fall into a trap of the eremite hunter Jon and Knut is seriously wounded. Siri climbs the hole to seek for help to Knut, but she is captured by Jon while a stranger kills Knut. Soon the teenagers are hunted down by the creepy serial-killer..
Plot: In 1988, a group of teenagers go to visit an abandoned hotel, only to find themselves hunted by a psychotic killer through the Norwegian woods.
Smart Tags: #murder_of_parents #broken_down_car #hiking #rural_setting #abandoned_building #skinny_dipping #male_rear_nudity #female_rear_nudity #pit_trap #impalement #impaled_through_the_head #chased_in_the_woods #hiding_under_the_floor #shot_with_an_arrow #hot_wiring_a_car #car_phone #walkman #stabbed_in_the_stomach #shot_to_death #shot_in_the_chest #impaled_to_death

Find Alternative – Fritt vilt III 2010, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	5.1/10 Votes: 4,280
	N/A | RottenTomatoes
	N/A | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 121 Popularity: 12.478 | TMDB

Reviews:

The Norsemen have gone Cold Turkey
“These Norwegians definitely know how to generate the right mood for an atmospheric and nightmarishly intense horror film. When is the last time a slasher actually scared you? There’s another entry on the way, apparently a prequel set in the 1980’s. I, for one, cannot wait!”

The above quote is actually copy/pasted from my own user comment for “Cold Prey II”, written somewhere late 2010, when I saw the first two films back-to-back. As you can read, I was very much impressed with this new slasher franchise – especially part two – and eagerly anticipated the third entry/prequel. Unfortunately now I have to temper my enthusiasm, because I have seen the prequel and it’s without exaggerating one of the biggest disappointments in years. The refreshing and genuinely suspenseful format has sadly turned into just another mundane and hugely derivative stalk & slash picture without any added value whatsoever. What made the first two movies so exceptional that is missing here? Well, two vital aspects are missing, in fact, namely an extraordinary setting and amiable characters. The first two “Cold Prey” movies were covered with snowy landscapes and largely took place in creepy isolated settings, first an abandoned skiing resort and second a nearly abandoned hospital, and it was one of these rare cases where the main characters were identifiable and sympathetic people that you didn’t necessarily wish they died in such barbaric way (but they nevertheless did, of course). The prequel takes place in and around the same skiing resort, but presumably in a much warmer season, as the teenage protagonists go camping in the surrounding woods and sleep under a clear sky without tents. Woods are a much more commonplace and familiar setting for slasher movies and, even though the Norwegian forests and streams are a lot more astounding than American ones, it’s not sufficient enough to excel. Even more unfortunate is the fact that the lead characters have become standard “Americanized” stereotypes, including gun-crazy machos and hormones-overloaded skinny dippers. The script also nearly doesn’t take enough advantage out of the prequel opportunities. “Cold Prey II” already hinted at a very fascinating background of the killer, a mentally disabled savage dumped by his parents near ravine in the midst of winter, but the prequel inexplicably doesn’t explore the basic events any further. After a brief intro set in 1976, which is the best part of the entire film, the film fast forwards twelve years to the late 80’s without giving any more clarifications regarding the killer’s persona, so I’m actually not even considering as an authentic prequel. Just a redundant episode between the origins and the later films. Not only does “Cold Prey III” not exploit the advantages of the prequel format, it doesn’t even grab the opportunity to make this a genuine 80’s throwback movie. There are very few elements reminding us that the story takes place in the 1980’s, except for the fact that one of the teenage characters listens to horrible punk-rock music on a prehistoric and bright yellow walkman device. Add to this several more dreadful sub genre clichés, clumsy editing, weak acting performances and unimaginative (again, especially in comparison to the previous installments) cinematography and we’ve got ourselves a very dumb and unmemorable slasher that even would have looked uninspired in the 80’s already. There’s a fair portion of brutality and gory effects, but those things you can nowadays even find in average TV-series, so don’t bother.

Excellent Departure
I’ve found the reviews of this film quite amusing and perplexing at the same time. I’m not sure what kind of “Horror Slasher Fans” are taking the time to lambast it but they obviously aren’t the fans of this genre they think they are. I thought maybe the onslaught of torture/gore porn that has sullied the horror/slasher genre over the last decade or so could be to blame. Seems if you aren’t dissecting the inners of victims over a 2 hour blood fest it’s not considered “horror” by these folks anymore. Sad really that they can no longer enjoy real horror but only respond to visceral gore and malingering torture.

Now on to this film, having and loving the first two, I found this, despite it being a slight departure from classic slasher to survival slasher, AMAZING. Now realize I’ve got about 1100 dvd/blurays in my physical collection so far, 50% at least of which are horror/slasher variants. I found this film so satisfying in its defiance of expected tropes. In a classic slasher I’ve always expected the “core victim pool” to contain 1 or 2 smart characters and the rest cannon fodder meant to attain the eye-rolls and OMGs of us viewers in the “That was such a stupid move” department, it’s expected. This movie gives you NONE of those and I’m so grateful. I found it such a joy to see a horror movie in which (Let’s take “Final Girl” Amy Steel from Friday the 13th Part 2 as example) we got an ENTIRE core victim group (CVG) of Amy Steels. Though the backstory of our killer is short and I wish there had been more, it certainly explained the root of the problem to my satisfaction.

As I stated, this movie ventured into survival horror quite a bit, and I was astounded as how much I was rooting for EVERY member of the CVG, no “Killed by stupidity” here, the killer had to WORK for each victim took, and boy did he have to work for it. I don’t think I’ve seen such a CVG of “Refuse to give it up easily” victims all in one movie before. They went through SO much and kept fighting back all the way to an ending that made my YELL out loud in both anger and frustration. (Then I realized that ending was non negotiable, if ended any other way they were have been serious problems with the continuity and ability to BE a sequel to the first 2 films). So despite the ending making me near cry out of “No it can’t end this way”. I understand there was no other choice as the other 2 movies would not have been possible without this ending. Unlike most typical slashers and survival horror films this film refused to include many tropes, their was no unearned easy kills, there was no “stupid moves” by the CVG, the CVG displayed fight, vigor, relentless will to survive and really did everything they could think of, (And that I could think of) to get out of the mess they were in. This both surprised me and excited me. This killer and his lack of feelings/emotion seemed particularly brutal to me, and yes, this movie lacked drawn out torture or sadomasochistic undertones. Yet it did have some gore, just enough to make it work.

So in conclusion, and without spoilers, this film is EXTREMLY mistreated in this review section, and those negs (I see right through you), should go back and put Saw and Chainsaw massacre on their players on repeat and chill out, because you obviously are one of those who have been completely drained of the REAL definition of horror films, especially where slashers or survival horror goes. If you are a fan of either of those genres (Slasher, Survival horror) you should find a way to see this. It’s a real shame this film has NO official release with English Dubs or English Subs. You will have to download an English subbed version from where ever you can find it on the internet. There are places you can watch that version (The English subs have been added post production and are not found on any official dvd/blurray). Which is a real shame. But if you can find it to watch, do so, it’s a GREAT film for Slasher/Survival Horror fans.

Other Information:

Original Language no
Runtime 1 hr 35 min (95 min) (Norway)
Budget 0
Revenue 2439448
Status Released
Rated N/A
Genre Horror, Thriller
Director Mikkel Brænne Sandemose
Writer Peder Fuglerud, Lars Gudmestad, Martin Sundland
Actors Ida Marie Bakkerud, Julie Rusti, Kim Falck
Country Norway
Awards N/A
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix N/A
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera Arricam LT (Zeiss Ultra Prime Lenses)
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm (Fuji Eterna 250D 8563, Eterna 500T 8573)
Cinematographic Process Spherical (2-perf)
Printed Film Format 35 mm